Female Salamanders Experience Higher Parasitism Compared to Males: A Cost of Female Reproduction?
Project Author
Issue Date
2020-09
Authors
Venesky, Matthew D.
DeMarchi, Joseph
Marbach, Rachel
Pariyar, Keva
Hickerson, Cari-Ann M.
Anthony, Carl D.
Loading...
Embargo
First Reader
Additional Readers
Keywords
item.page.distribution
Abstract
Males tend to experience higher rates of parasitism compared to females, a phenomenon associated with ecological factors, the fact that males engage in risky behaviors, and because testosterone is known to be immunosuppressive. However, females could experience higher rates of parasitism if energy is allocated from costly immune responses towards producing eggs. We used pooled data sets from laboratory experiments to investigate sex-specific differences in salamander (Plethodon cinereus) resistance to the emerging fungal pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd). Contrary to our predictions, we found that female salamanders had a higher prevalence of infection (similar to 56%) and carried a higher Bd infection burden (455 zoospores equivalents per sample) compared to male salamanders (which had a Bd infection prevalence of similar to 24% and an average infection burden of 58 zoospore equivalents per sample). We also found that female reproductive investment (i.e., mass of eggs) positively correlated with Bd infection burden, suggesting that females who previously invested more into reproduction carried a higher Bd infection burden. Collectively, our findings might indicate that female salamanders experience a cost of reproduction in the form of decreased disease resistance.
Description
Chair
Major
Department
Biology
Recorder
License
Copyright 2020 Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles
Citation
Matthew D. Venesky, Joseph DeMarchi, Rachel Marbach, Keva Pariyar, Cari-Ann M. Hickerson, and Carl D. Anthony "Female Salamanders Experience Higher Parasitism Compared to Males: A Cost of Female Reproduction?," Journal of Herpetology 54(3), 293-298, (21 October 2020). https://doi.org/10.1670/19-072
Version
Published article
Honors
Publisher
Soc. Studies Amphibians Reptiles