Lucas and Hume on Monetary Non-neutrality: A Tension between the Logic and the Technique of Economics
Persistent URL
Author(s)
Bilo, Simon
Date Issued
November 1, 2017
Abstract
Economists lost a valid theory of monetary non-neutrality, which relates to how new money enters the economy at different points and in the process changes relative prices. This theory was introduced by David Hume, among others, but it has since disappeared from the leading conversations. The disappearance was not caused by any theoretical or empirical weakness, however. Using Robert Lucas’s Nobel lecture as a case study, I argue that the theory might have disappeared because it did not fit into the popular technical frameworks’ modeling constraints, which view money as inherently neutral and introduce non-neutrality only through external frictions.
Journal
Eastern Economic Journal
Department
Economics
Citation
Bilo, S. Eastern Econ J (2018) 44: 364. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41302-017-0104-3
Publisher
Palgrave MacMillan
Version of Article
Published article
DOI
10.1057/s41302-017-0104-3
ISSN
0094-5056
1939-4632
Rights
© EEA 2017
File(s)![Thumbnail Image]()
Name
2017-11-01_Bilo_Lucas_Access_Instructions.pdf
Description
Access Instructions
Size
84.04 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (etag)
6f36968b24749aae3ae2795b20b99348