Predator defense along a permanence gradient: roles of case structure, behavior, and developmental phenology in caddisflies.
Persistent URL
Author(s)
Wissinger, Scott A.
Whissel, John C.
Eldermire, Charles
Brown, Wendy S.
Date Issued
February 7, 2006
Abstract
Species replacements along freshwater permanence gradients are well documented, but underlying mechanisms are poorly understood for most taxa. In subalpine wetlands in Colorado, the relative abundance of caddisfly larvae shifts from temporary to permanent basins. Predators on caddisflies also shift along this gradient; salamanders (Ambystoma tigrinum nebulosum) in permanent ponds are replaced by predaceous diving beetles (Dytiscus dauricus) in temporary habitats. We conducted laboratory and field experiments to determine the effectiveness of caddisfly cases in reducing vulnerability to these predators. We found that larvae of a temporary-habitat caddisfly (Asynarchus nigriculus) were the most vulnerable to salamanders. Two relatively invulnerable species (Limnephilus externus, L. picturatus) exhibited behaviors that reduced the likelihood of detection and attack, whereas the least vulnerable species (Agrypnia deflata) was frequently detected and attacked, but rarely captured because cases provided an effective refuge. Vulnerability to beetle predation was also affected by cases. The stout cases of L. externus larvae frequently deterred beetle larvae, whereas the tubular cases of the other species were relatively ineffective. Two of these vulnerable species (A. nigriculus and L. picturatus) often co-occur with beetles; thus, case construction alone is insufficient to explain patterns of caddisfly coexistence along the permanence gradient. One explanation for the coexistence of these two species with beetles is that they develop rapidly during early
summer and pupate before beetle larvae become abundant. One species (L. picturatus) pupates by burying into soft substrates that serve as a refuge. The other (A. nigriculus) builds stone pupal cases, which in field experiments, more than doubles survival compared to organic pupal cases. The combined results of these experiments suggest that caddisfly distributions along permanence gradients depend on a suite of primary and secondary predator defenses that include larval and pupal case structure, predator-specific escape behaviors, and the phenology of larval development.
Journal
Oecologia
Department
Biology
Citation
Wissinger, S.A., Whissel, J.C., Eldermire, C., and Brown, W.S. (2006). Predator defense along a permanence gradient: roles of case structure, behavior, and developmental phenology in caddisflies. Oecologia 147(4): 667-678. doi:10.1007/s00442-005-0303-1
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Version of Article
Original manuscript prior to peer review (preprint)
DOI
10.1007/s00442-005-0303-1
ISSN
0029-8549
e1432-1939
Rights
This article was selected and published in Oecologia © 2006 Wissinger, Whissel, Eldermire, and Brown. All rights reserved.
File(s)![Thumbnail Image]()
![Thumbnail Image]()
Name
Wissinger_2006_Oecologia_Cover.pdf
Description
Cover
Size
329.77 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (etag)
058d020c16bfa3eb1c3b4f0b4afa7909
Name
Wissinger_et_al_2006_Oecologia.pdf
Description
Main Document
Size
342.22 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (etag)
293c775b3243173366dd933affcce754